| | | |
| | |
|
|
More Protests After NYC Decision
A NYC grand jury decided not to indict the NYPD officer in the death of
Eric Garner. As a result, protests have erupted throughout the country,
particularly in New York City, just days after the grand jury decision
in Ferguson sparked similar protests. The July death of Eric Garner was
the result of his resistant arrest, being placed in a headlock by NYPD
officer Daniel Pantaleo, and other health complications that exacerbated
the situation. Garner was being arrested for the petty crime of
selling loose cigarettes on the street.
Before we get to the protests and fallout from the grand jury's
decision, let's pause for a moment to reflect on the stupidity of the
law that led to this tragedy.
We have limited police resources to handle criminals and keep our
communities safe. Yet politicians insist on passing bureaucratic laws,
such as the ones related to cigarette sales in New York City, which
force officers to waste their time enforcing laws which are ridiculous.
I can't blame the officers for enforcing such laws, after all that is
their job, but the government which creates such an environment. In this
case, I'm referring to the laws related to sales in New York City.
Buying a pack of cigarettes in New York City costs well over $10 per
pack, and this is because of outrageous taxes; the government alone gets
about $6 of every pack sold. Additionally, the laws related to the
sale of cigarettes are seemingly more strident than if one were to
smoke marijuana on the street corner, which will garner you a simple
summons.
In the case of Garner, he was confronted by police for selling a loose,
untaxed cigarette. This is illegal for one purpose: government greed.
Doing so deprives the government of its precious taxes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We Need to Do Better
Let me be clear, the death of Eric Garner is a shame because he didn't
have to be in the situation he found himself in if it wasn't for
government. Nonetheless, officers have a duty to enforce the laws and
that's what happened in this case. Eric Garner was breaking the law and
video shows him resisting arrest. Police are also allowed to use force
to arrest someone, particularly if they are resisting arrest, though
there are limits on this as well.
For example, a true "choke-hold" is banned by NYPD regulations, though
not illegal under New York law. While this case has been known for its
"choke-hold," technically this was not what happened to Garner. There
is an important, legal distinction between a choke-hold and a headlock.
Unfortunately those distinctions don't matter much when there is an
agenda to fulfill. Don't get me wrong, the death of Garner is a shame
and it took too long for him to receive medical treatment (about 4
minutes). But to use this as another example of overt police brutality,
especially related to race is simply missing the mark.
As was pointed out in the New York Post,
"There were 228,000 misdemeanor arrests in New York City in 2013, the
last year for which there are audited figures, and every one of them had
at least the potential to turn into an Eric Garner-like case. None
did." The case of Eric Garner, while a down-right shame, is an outlier
and not part of a systematic pattern of abuse.
The confrontation was caused by a bad law - is anyone going to look at
blaming the government here? The grand jury made the right decision.
The state of New York is one greedy state and this is one bad law that's
created this environment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment