| | | |
| | |
|
|
Iranian Sanctions
The House is holding hearings on imposing new sanctions on Iran despite
Obama's promise to veto such efforts. Does President Obama recognize
the danger of a nuclear Iran, and is he doing everything he can to
really stop it?
The Obama administration's posture at this point in the negotiations
is not to dismantle Iran's nuclear capabilities but merely to delay in
the inevitable. This is dangerous.
Iran has declared that Israel should be wiped from the face of the
Earth. It also is the largest supporter of terrorist networks
throughout the region, including the rebels that have just toppled the
regime in Yemen.
Why are we to trust the Iranians? The deadline for reaching a deal
has already been extended twice. Iran has violated the terms of our
agreements by continuing to expand its nuclear program within Iran and
even, reportedly, in Syria.
This issue is important enough for members of Obama's own party to challenge him on imposing sanctions.
This issue is important enough for Republicans to make the bold
gesture of inviting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to speak
to this issue before a joint session.
This issue is important enough for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu to accept the invitation, knowing the message it would send to
President Obama and the world.
The Congress and Israel seem willing to risk undermining President
Obama in order to achieve their goal on this issue. Either they view
Obama as already weak, and therefore not much more damage could be
done. Or they believe that making Obama look weak on the world stage is
worth the risk when faced with the long-term consequences of a nuclear
Iran.
Loyal Democrats like Senator Bob Menendez labeled the Obama
administration's talking points on their negotiations with Iran as
coming “straight out of Tehran.”
The Washington Post points out
that very few people on Capitol Hill “have confidence that President
Obama can negotiate an agreement that will keep Iran from having nuclear
weapons.”
Ed Rogers at The Washington Post continues,
“The stakes are too high to just shrug, defer to the president and hope
for the best. Americans are about to receive a strong signal from
Congress on the importance of the situation with Iran – the kind of
signal that only a bipartisan vote for more sanctions – over the
president’s objection – can provide.”
Up until this point, Obama has been able to get away with one foreign
policy disaster after another. But it seems as though we've finally
reached an issue where we recognize that the implications are far too
dangerous for us to allow Obama to bungle. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bergdahl a Deserter
Last summer, Barack Obama announced with great fanfare the return of a
soldier by the name of Bowe Bergdahl, who was reportedly captured and
held hostage by the Taliban since 2009.
Bergdahl's return came in exchange for the release of five of the top Taliban leadership held at Guantanamo Bay.
But then we learned from members of Bergdahl's platoon that he was not captured but intentionally deserted his fellow soldiers.
The official investigation is now complete and according to Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer, Bergdahl is, in fact, a deserter.
Hoping to make the situation go away, the White House has allegedly tried to stonewall the release of the Army investigation.
This is just another blundering embarrassment for this administration.
Source: Washington Free Beacon & Fox News |
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment