| | | |
| | |
|
|
Challenging WH-Iran Deal
Yesterday I told you about the letter sent by 47 GOP senators to Iranian
leaders, explaining how our U.S. Constitution works in regards to the
signing of treaties. It has stirred up the Obama administration,
Democratic lawmakers and Iranian officials.
The GOP senators explained the process by which Congress must ratify
treaties. Without Congressional approval, any deal agreed upon by Obama
and Iran will be seen as nothing more than an executive agreement,
which wouldn't necessarily hold once Obama left office. With less than
two years to go, this means that Iran's U.S.-approved path to the bomb
wouldn't hold should it chose to be challenged by the next
administration or Congress.
Democratic colleagues in the senate labeled the letter a "stunt" and inappropriate. Harry Reid opined
that the letter was petty and "diminishes us as a country in the eyes
of the world." There's nothing diminishing about standing up for our
Constitution and doing what it takes to stop a bad deal with potentially
catastrophic consequences.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest called the GOP letter
"a partisan strategy to undermine the president's ability to conduct
foreign policy and advance our national security interests around the
globe." Well when the president is on the precipice of unilaterally
approving a horrific deal, that is not in the best interest of our
national security, what else would you have the Congress do? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An Unusual Coalition
Obama himself said that the letter put the GOP senators in "common cause with hardliners in Iran. It's an unusual coalition."
And
Vice President Joe Biden issued a statement declaring that the letter
"offends me as a matter of principle" and is "beneath the dignity" of
the senate. Biden said
, "In thirty-six years in the United States Senate, I cannot recall
another instance in which senators wrote directly to advise another
country - much less a longtime foreign adversary - that the president
does not have the constitutional authority to reach a meaningful
understanding with them."
Republican Senator Tom Cotton, who spearheaded the letter to Iran, responded to Biden's criticism on MSNBC this morning:
"Joe Biden, as Barack Obama's own secretary of defense [Robert Gates]
has said, has been wrong about nearly every foreign policy and national
security decision in the last 40 years ... "Moreover, if Joe Biden
respects the dignity of the institution of the Senate he should be
insisting that the president submit any deal to approval of the Senate,
which is exactly what he did on numerous deals during his time in
Senate."
He's absolutely right. As Adam White points out in the Weekly Standard
, Biden is hypocritical when it
comes to his criticism of the senators who demand Congress be a part of
the process. Biden himself has lectured the White House on the
importance of the "constitutional partnership" between Congress and the
executive when it comes to treaties. In 1989, for instance, Biden
concluded that "The essence of the treaty power is that the president
and the Senate are partners in the process by which the United States
enters into, and adheres to, international obligations." It seems as
though our Constitution, checks and balances, are only convenient when
trying to push his own agenda.
Iran's foreign minister says the
letter shows that the United States is "not trustworthy." Looks who's
talking about trust! It's the Iranians who are not to be trusted when
it comes to these negotiations.
Nonetheless, a vast majority of the American people (71%) have little faith that these negotiations will make a difference in stopping Iran from getting nuclear weapons. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment