 |  |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |
 |
Avoiding Tough Questions on Iran
The Iranian nuclear deadline of June 30th is rapidly approaching.
Evidence is mounting that Iran is already violating agreements, while
Barack Obama is essentially admitting that we have no leverage to stop
the Iranians.
June 30th is the current deadline for Iran and
international powers like the United States to reach a final agreement
on its nuclear capabilities. Here are three important questions to consider:
1. How can we trust that the Iranians will abide by these this agreement?
2. Are we certain that the agreement we are crafting is taking all
security issues into account and that Iran's intentions are pure?
3. Does the United States even have the leverage to solidify a tough deal and to enforcement it? Can we trust the Iranians?
The answer is no. New revelations are only adding to this mistrust.
According to a report in the New York Times this week, Iran's stockpile
of nuclear materials has grown 20% during the last 18 months. This
means that while nuclear negotiations were happening, it was violating
its 2013 interim agreement with Western powers.
For the past few days, the spokeswoman for the State Department has
endured dozens of questions and criticism on the government's pushback
on this report. Even mainstream journalists are calling out the State
Department for not being more concerned about this news and how it could
or should impact negotiations. How can we be sure that the Iranian's intentions when it comes to nuclear capabilities are pure?
According to experts, our negotiations solely over Iran's nuclear capabilities are missing the bigger picture.
In order to really gauge and contain Iran's real nuclear ambitions,
our State Department should have also been negotiating Iran's missile
technology capabilities. After all, it's one thing to have a nuclear
weapon but it's another thing to be able to have the weapons systems to
deliver it.
Dr. David Cooper, chair of the Department of
National Security Affairs at the U.S. Naval War College, says that
missile technology “turns out to be a remarkably accurate litmus test
about any state’s nuclear intentions.”
Yet as of right now, missile technology is not a part of this deal, which Obama is obsessed in securing...
continue reading |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Bill Clinton's foundation cashed in as Sweden lobbied Hillary on sanctions
According to documents obtained by The Washington Times:
“Bill
Clinton’s foundation set up a fundraising arm in Sweden that collected
$26 million in donations at the same time that country was lobbying
Hillary Rodham Clinton’s State Department to forgo sanctions that
threatened its thriving business with Iran …
As the money flowed to the foundation from Sweden, Mrs. Clinton’s
team in Washington declined to blacklist any Swedish firms despite
warnings from career officials at the U.S. Embassy in Stockholm that
Sweden was growing its economic ties with Iran and potentially
undercutting Western efforts to end Tehran’s rogue nuclear program.”
The hits just keep on coming for the Clintons.
Source: Washington Times |
 |
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment